What Makes A Good Friend?

Alexis Elder, University of Minnesota Duluth

Good friendships seem worth celebrating. But for many of us, tensions can appear from time to time between being a good friend and doing “the right thing.” When faced with, for example, a situation where it’s tempting to lie to cover for a friend, it can seem as though friendship and morality are on a collision course.

I am an ethicist who works on issues involving friendship, so this tension is of great interest to me. It can be tempting to say that bad people are likely to treat their friends badly: For example, they could lie, cheat or steal from their friends. But it seems logically possible for a person to be bad to some people but good to others. So are there other, more fundamental reasons to think being a good person is necessary for a good friendship?

Problems for friendship and morality

Let’s begin by looking at cases where morality and the demands of friendship are in conflict.

Blithely acting on what we think is best for our friends, when the friend disagrees, seems paternalistic.

Friendship seems to require that we be open to our friends’ ways of seeing things, even when they differ from our own. It also seems to require that we be concerned for our friends’ well-being. It’s not just that we desire good things for them. We also want to be involved ourselves in providing at least some of those goods. This is one thing that distinguishes the care of friends from that of mere well-wishers. But we also need to remain open to our friends’ beliefs about what is good for them: Blithely acting on what we think is best for our friends, when the friend disagrees, seems paternalistic. In some circumstances, like hiding a friend’s keys when he’s been drinking, a little paternalism might be permitted. But it seems a poor general feature of friendship.

Some theorists argue that it is this openness to friends’ perspectives that introduces moral danger. For example, friendship with a person who has different values can gradually change your own, including for the worse. This is especially true when the relationship makes you inclined to take their point of view seriously. Other scholars argue that it is the combination of the desire to help friends with this openness to their point of view that poses the biggest problem. In making this argument, scholars Dean Cocking and Jeanette Kennett quote a line from Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice.” In this line, the protagonist Elizabeth Bennett tells the cold and inflexible Mr. Darcy that “A regard for the requester would often make one yield readily to a request, without waiting for arguments to reason one into it.”

In other words, if your friend asks you to tell the boss she’s sick, not hungover, you should do it, just because she asked.

Aristotle on virtue in friendship

In order to respond to these concerns, it is helpful to review what Aristotle says about friendship and being a good person. For Aristotle, there are three main kinds of friendships. One, friendships of utility: as, for example, between friendly co-workers. Two, friendships of pleasure: for example, between members of a trivia team. And, three, friendships among those who find each other good and valuable for their own sakes. This last one he calls friendships of virtue, the best and fullest form of friendship.

It seems reasonably clear then why valuing someone for their virtues is characteristic of good friendship. Unlike the other forms of friendship, it involves valuing friends for themselves, not just for what they can do for you. Furthermore, it involves thinking their character and values have worth.

Some might worry that this sets the standard too high: Requiring that good friends be perfectly good would make good friendship impossibly rare. But Aristotelian scholar John Cooper argues that we can just take this to mean that the quality of a friendship varies with the quality of the friends’ characters. Mediocre people will tend to have mediocre friendships, while better people will have better friendships, all else being equal.


THE CONVERSATION US launched as a pilot project in October 2014. It is an independent source of news and views from the academic and research community, delivered direct to the public. Our team of professional editors work with university and research institute experts to unlock their knowledge for use by the wider public. We aim to help rebuild trust in journalism. All authors and editors sign up to our Editorial Charter. All contributors must abide by our Community Standards policy. We only allow authors to write on a subject on which they have proven expertise, which they must disclose alongside their article. Authors’ funding and potential conflicts of interest must also be disclosed. Failure to do so carries a risk of being banned from contributing to the site. The Conversation started in Melbourne Victoria and the innovative technology platform and development team is based in the university and research precinct of Carlton. Our newsroom is based in Boston but our team is part of a global newsroom able to share content across sites and around the world. The Conversation US is a non-profit educational entity.​

SOLD OUT! JOIN OUR WAITING LIST! It's not a virtual event. It's not a conference. It's not a seminar, a meeting, or a symposium. It's not about attracting a big crowd. It's not about making a profit, but rather about making a real difference. LEARN MORE HERE



  1. “What sweetness is left in life, if you take away friendship? Robbing life of friendship is like robbing the world of the sun. A true friend is more to be esteemed than kinsfolk.” Marcus Tullius Cicero

    The only way to have a true friend is to BE one.

  2. Tough topic for sure.

    I know that I can be friends with differing political viewpoints, even in these amazingly tough times, as long as they’re not thrown in my face. As long as I can continue to see the good in my friend. As long as I can believe that deep down — while we may disagree on some details — we still align at the heart of the issue. On values.

    For me, differences can’t be rooted in morality, because that would mean we couldn’t really be friends.

    I’m finding myself at a loss for words. Ouch.

  3. Insightful views on friendship. I always questioned friendship as I think I am a good friend, yet if I did not agree with others’ life choices and values, I was on the outside looking in. I now realize I was an observer making a decision about my true interest in being friends with people who I could not, at least, 80% or so, align with. I have been nastily dumped as a friend because I did not align with others’ political views; even though these views were never discussed. Not a friend, really, as I had thought. Onward and upward I say. Many thanks for this piece.