The Big Bang Gun Control Controversy (My Take)

Vantage Points Header Joel ElvesonFOR YEARS As children we were entertained, enthralled, and educated by The Muppets. There was Miss Piggy, Kermit The Frog, Cookie Monster, etc. Each had their own distinctive personality with their own distinctive voice and tonal inflections. Yet when the lights went dim at the end of the show the Muppets fell silent. Without the puppeteers to breathe life into them (Jim Henson’s genius in creating this lovable bunch) all you had was a bunch of cute puppets who sat on shelves.

Who can forget the brilliant Wayland Flowers and his sassy puppet Madame. We sat there amused and stunned when Mr. Flowers would drink water while Madame continued to speak whatever was on her (his) mind at the time. At the end of the show when the strings were put down Madame returned to being a lifeless figure.

Road rage related violence is very common place. One driver gets irritated by another drive for one reason or another resulting all too often in serious injury or worse. Pedestrians are hit by cars or narrowly missed countless times all over the country by speeding cars or overly aggressive drivers. The car is not the root cause nor will tougher vehicle traffic laws (other than DWI) dramatically reduce this problem.

Former Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is a gun owner whose gun sits on his front porch. Each day the mailman delivers mail to the Romney residence without a single incident of being grazed by a bullet or seeing the smoky chambers from a gun that has just been fired. Point in fact the gun is of no threat to anybody when it is left to be.

Numerous schools have experienced the horror of innocent teachers and children being shot down in cold blood by crazed gunmen who may or may not have passed a background checked or possibly obtained their weaponry through so-called black markets. The same holds true for shootings at Movie Theaters where movie goers were gunned down for no reason other than the gunman’s obsessive need to kill others.

In each and every case the gun was the culprit as opposed to just being the mechanism used. The solution according to our President is to disarm responsible gun owners while at the same time make it exceptionally difficult to purchase a gun. More rigid background checks cannot hurt but by and large that is just an exercise in bureaucratic red tape that will produce no tangible reduction in gun related deaths.

The problem is that there are too many guns in the hands of those who should not have them. You can argue there are those whose job requires the carrying of a gun who were deemed perfectly mentally stable only to inexplicably snap or panic causing them to fire at will are a risk of irrational shootings as well. Do we then disarm our police, soldiers, armed security along with all others whose job cannot be performed safely without carrying a gun?

Our forefathers by virtue of the Second Amendment granted us the right to bear arms knowing full well there will be abuse of this right. Owning a gun does not grant the right to use the weapon in whatever manner the owner decides to use it. The right of free speech does not give you permission to use words to incite violence nor threaten violence. Hate speech is also not covered under the first amendment. Perhaps using the same irrational thought process as the gun control proponents we should limit free speech.

I do not own gun or have any desire to own one. As a personal rule of thumb I am not a fan of guns as they are vile instruments of death especially in the hands of criminals who despite all of this legislative fanfare will still own guns. The idea of towns where just about everybody carries a gun is not someplace I would be overly comfortable living. However, I have no issue with responsible (who decides who is worthy of owning a gun is subject to debate as well) citizens owning a gun. Once again it is a right that is granted by the United States Constitution that one man cannot take away with the stroke of a pen.

The one gun related qualm I do have is with the “sport” of hunting. Shooting an animal for the sake of using it as a trophy is a barbaric act. Using guns for the purpose of controlling certain animal populations is equally barbaric. When animals over populate it is due to in many cases to not humanely controlling their reproductive capability. Why should these animals be allowed to fall prey to over-zealous “ animal control specialists (aka legalized murderers) for the sin of being alive? Placing blame where it does not belong is the same mentality as gun control. Animals killed for human consumption is sad but does serve a very legitimate purpose which hunting does not do.

So where do we go from here? What is the solution to the rising tide of gun violence? The only solution I can think of is let a consortium of professionals create a system where guns continue to be legal yet somehow have more concerted effort to get guns (good luck with this) away from the pipelines that pump these illegal firearms onto the streets. The best solution to this problem is……! You get the picture.

Joel Elveson
Joel Elvesonhttp://billions1.wix.com/fasthire
INDEPENDENT Executive Recruiting By Joel is an "up and coming" Executive Search Firm formed and headed up by Joel Elveson whose visionary ideas, leadership & creativity has brought to life a more "user friendly" approach to recruiting. His clients and candidates form powerful strategic partnerships that we use to help you. Joel’s Firm offers Permanent, Temporary (case by case), & Temporary To Permanent staffing solutions for all of your Human Capital Requirements. Contract IT/Consultants are available if needed. Above and beyond they are experts (by way of their personal industry work experience) with mortgage, mortgage banking, middle market banking, accounting, along with many others under the vast financial spectrum of disciplines. Their business goes beyond candidate recruiting as they also train, mentor and develop your internal recruiting staff with an eye towards helping you reduce the cost of hiring. They will also work in areas such as compensation, effective onboarding processes and alike. In other words their business is to help your business by becoming an extension of you by filling in gaps that cause delay or waste. The recruiting methods employed by Joel’s team are time tested that result in a high rate of successful placements. Joel was trained in the art of recruiting by some of the top staffing industry executives in addition to the best recruiter trainers who to this day drive me us to exceed the lofty goals he has set forth.
avatar
3000
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous
Anonymous

So sad that your article is very true, Joel. Fortunately, I live in Canada and we do not have the same issues here as few people have guns in their homes. I did go to school in the US and was awed by how many people had guns in their homes and how many little kids used them on their friends or siblings because they see it on TV. I am not a fan of guns and figure that if I had one for “protection” a stronger man could just take away and use it on me. I hope that someday better regulations will be made to make it safer.

Johnny Johnston

Joel, you need to dig deeper. I have owned guns my entire life and still do. Knives, cars, abortion, drowning and the human fist kills far more people than guns do. As for the President, he strongly supports the 2nd amendment and the right to bare arms as well as understands that the right to bare arms was directed more in the defense of tyranny in our own government and had to do nothing with hunting as most during that period in history were only able to eat because of their firearms which made it a moot point. Finally in reference to hunting, we would not have the wildlife in this country today if it weren’t for groups like Ducks Unlimited or the harvesting of deer and elk that if it didn’t occur, would die of starvation or disease. Joel, I love you like a brother but the good Lord gave antelopes horns to defend themselves from lions, criminals could care less about laws, much less gun free zones and the police won’t show up until well after a robbery or rape has occurred. We have the right to defend ourselves and should this country try to disarm it’s law abiding citizens it would lead to a Civil War

Ed Skinner
Ed Skinner

If there were any easy answers, they would’ve been implemented centuries ago.
The fundamental problem is, sad to say, humanity. As a race, we are subject to aggressive rages, irrational flights of fantasy, and outright cruelty to others. Until those tendencies are cured–and I shudder when I imagine just what *that* might entail–weapons of any kind are problematic. Guns, knives, chainsaws, cars that can jump curbs, closed fists, fingers that clench, all these will have to be removed. And even then, man is a creative creature. Given provocation, some will still find a way.
I’m not condoning a lawless society. Limits and rules for social behavior must exist and be enforced. But it is the law-breaker, not the possibility of, that must be removed from society.

JUST 1 CLICK

IS ALL IT TAKES TO LEARN SOMETHING NEW TODAY

Must Read

JUST 1 CLICK

IS ALL IT TAKES TO BEGIN ENJOYING OUR PODCASTS

JUST 1 CLICK

IS ALL IT TAKES TO EXPLORE OUR INSPIRING GLOBAL COMMUNITIES

Email List Login