Social Conflict Today

Social conflict is ingrained in history. Sociologists and historians provide valid arguments to support the beneficial and negative aspects linked to social dissension and dispute. Determining what’s beneficial and what is not becomes more accessible when looked at in retrospective, often decades afterward. It would be useful, however, to gain some preliminary insight into to what is causing social conflict today and where it’s actually leading us to before the costs begin to outweigh the benefits.

The DNA of Social Conflict

In general, social collision and quarrel are linked to many causes. It develops in both vertical and horizontal contexts. Economic, territorial, religious, cultural, ethnical, environmental, biological, climatic and other factors create a mix of cocktails that lead to unrest and conflict. It can be sudden or it can develop very slowly, at times even barely noticeable until it explodes.

One can study social conflict from other angles, such as identifying, understanding and engaging the actors. This is useful as the outcome of social conflict is closely linked to the individuals and group’s ability to manage it through social interaction.

This is key for determining its outcome but, in addition, also critical in determining its cost. More often than not, the latter has a much more immediate effect. In other words, the handling of social conflict will affect costs and results, and in that order. The whole idea boils down to minimizing cost and maximizing gain. Is this possible?

Social Conflict Today

From class struggle to cultural hegemony, theorists have all added a large variety of ways to look at and understand social conflict. It’s not the aim to discuss all of these approaches here, though not because these have nothing to contribute to a greater understanding of the subject, especially in a historical context.

We can quickly grasp the idea when looking at this issue at a family or at smaller social scale, such as within one’s work place. The theoretical potential to maximize gains and minimizing costs is evidently there.

We can certainly identify and use various facets of modern conflict theory to broaden our understanding of a wide range of current social issues. These can be, for example, linked to gender, race, pay-gap, class, globalization inequalities, etc.. The list can be long, but they do not rank equally in terms of how they are identified or in the cost-benefit equation. Hence, identifying the DNA of social conflict requires that we perform an MR and not just an X-ray of the complex make-up of our society to properly identify the deteriorated or broken links of our society’s fabric. We can quickly grasp the idea when looking at this issue at a family or at smaller social scale, such as within one’s workplace. The theoretical potential to maximize gains and minimizing costs is evidently there. Most will agree to this. But how does one first identify and measure costs or gains? How is this accomplished?

In my opinion, society and the individuals that integrate it have real problems in understanding what is really at stake. As a result, the possibility to deal with gains and costs is limited or made close to impossible for ordinary people just getting by on society’s mainstream.

The New Manipulative Tools of Social Conflict

As mentioned earlier, getting to know the actors is essential in order to find adequate engagement and solutions to conflict. This is where it starts getting complicated and the following are reasons as to why this is so.

The real actors and their roles in the conflict are not easily identifiable and the underlying nature of social conflict is concealed in order not to reveal the vested interests.

Confusion in the description of the nature of the social conflict is an essential part of manipulation and an effective weapon.

Combustion and clamor is achieved through analogous channels easily accessible to both manipulators and legitimate actors.

Bogus information – which always has existed – is carefully designed with state-of-the-art technology and marketing psychology and segmentation in order to reach large target audiences and trigger expected responses through emotions rather than through reflection.

Manipulation and deceit have acquired very powerful tools during the last decade. The strategies and techniques of social manipulation include the use of the following: Distraction, degradation, distortion, complacency, guilt, ignorance, stupidity, vulgarity, arousal and last, but not least, hate.

The sophistication of manipulation has caught almost everyone by surprise. The techniques utilized do not differ much from the ones used by psychopaths, sociopaths and predators and which we often see and have learned to recognize in movies and TV series. What changes is that society at large and certain parts of it have become the carefully selected prey. The action takes place in unmapped invisible terrain, just as if rats were moving at great speed through our water and sewage systems, spreading disease and fear. It’s just as if social conflict was taking place at different levels of consciousness and fading into unconsciousness.

We are living in a Nietzschean world. His rabid descriptions are quite fitting. Are we, at the end of the day, our own worst enemies? Benjamin Franklin once said: “I have met the enemy, and it is in the eyes of other people”. Which is it?

The Effect of Social Conflict

Though it is true that social media and all the technology that goes with it has allowed protesters around the world to activate social response and some degree of change, we must start understanding that the same technology in the hands of the mighty with political and economic gain, which often go hand in hand, can cause mayhem.

The question is whether the image we ultimately want to sit with is that of an Egyptian girl activist holding her mobile in Cairo during the Arab Spring marches against oppression, or the Q T-shirts at a political rally in the U.S., if not the outright outbursts of violent hatred among people who have the perfectly equally available option to live in peace and in a place of proactive social compromise.

Whether social conflict turns at to be an irredeemable sunk cost, with little or no enlightenment in the permanent quest for improvement, is not a responsibility that ultimately sits with the perpetrators of manipulation with sinister objectives in mind; the responsibility ultimately lies with the society at large, that is, of each and everyone, lest we want to look like the very descriptive image of this article.

Apply the idea that “one is one’s greatest enemy” to the words attributed to the Chinese warrior and philosopher Sun Tzu: f you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not to fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.

Tired of the notion of a hundred battles, and as a challenging but soothing alternative, I offer Nietzsche’s quote:

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.


Ragnar A. Brigg
Ragnar A. Brigg
RAGNAR is passionate about his pursuit of a better understanding of our “global village” in a range of topics. Despite his business, educational and personal life experience having given him much to draw from, he still aims at not being curtailed by “excess weight” in order to try maintain a fresh and balanced perspective on today’s rapidly changing world. He believes that everything that happens is convolutedly intertwined and that we all are, for better or for worse, at the very heart of it. Ragnar feels an urge to try discovering, unmasking, divulging or denouncing what and how he sees things. Often it’s about soul searching and storytelling; or about engaging himself in learning and critical analysis in order to expand his borders and sharing it, whenever possible. Ragnar has lived in several countries and held management positions in major entities. From his very early exposure to technology, his career moved to the re-/insurance and finance areas, where team building and general management skills were pivotal; later to entrepreneurial activities, both as consultant, international business-model researcher as well as trader and industrial project designer/developer. Ragnar is fluent in a number of languages and has a passion for others. He holds a B.Sc. from Florida Tech/F.I.T. and an MBA from the University of Chicago. He has recently reestablished himself with his wife in Norway. Besides some niche consulting jobs Ragnar is currently working on two book projects, both of which require much research in libraries in different countries.

DO YOU HAVE THE "WRITE" STUFF? If you’re ready to share your wisdom of experience, we’re ready to share it with our massive global audience – by giving you the opportunity to become a published Contributor on our award-winning Site with (your own byline). And who knows? – it may be your first step in discovering your “hidden Hemmingway”. LEARN MORE HERE


  1. Ragnar, I am of the opinion that human/social conflict is seldom recognized for what it is and thus is not dealt with in ways that can resolve the issues. Whether we are looking at domestic, racial, religious, or geographic conflict don’t they all have the commonality of being a grab for power? Those conflicts that are long-standing such as racial or religious conflict eventually develop a life of their own. The generations of hate simply lose recognition of what started it and hate becomes the fuel to keep the flames burning.

    • Hi Ken. I quite agree with much of what you mention, particularly with what you say about “thus not dealt with in ways that can resolve issues” and then also when you state that “generations of hate lose recognition of what started it”. Regarding the idea of “power” as a common denominator it’s true that this may be the case in many cases, but in my opinion (and even to my surprise) there are other ingredients, or even main contributors. Hatred and aggressive behavior takes place in certain parts of our brain and there are different neurological processes for anger or hatred (not to mention other “reactions”). Group hate, for example, is different, than individual hatred. Hence, all I am trying to say is that we cannot ignore the influence of ignorance, in connection with fear, or the ease with which people are manipulated. Like all feelings, fear, hatred or love, have a function, and may be considered natural. My concern is “mass hatred”, and worse, when it leads to violence. Thanks.