Never Make These Mistakes

The idea of this post started when I was pondering on weather forecasts and how much I must believe in their predictions. We know such forecasts have maximum reliability of about 80 for short periods and their reliability falls off sharply as time gets longer.

The question that brewed in my mind is if forecasts are unreliable should I abide by them? My answer is yes because even though they are not completely reliable they still give an indication. Therefore, if the forecast says it is going to be a rainy day I had better take an umbrella when I go out. This is not an ideal or perfect solution, but it is good enough to do.

The reason we do not and shall never be able to predict the weather with complete accuracy is its complexity and subject to the butterfly effect. Any change in weather might bring a huge change in the weather later.

The same analogy extends to human behavior. This behavior is complex and predicting human behavior can only be a good guess. Human behavior is indifferent to the weather forecast in this context.

I may conclude that Anchoring a rule, law, or model to human behavior is wrong because human behavior is unpredictable.

Examples from experience

The first example is the coronavirus– There are available few vaccines to protect us from this wicked virus. We still do not have enough knowledge about them and their long time side effects. Some people started to spread rumors that they cause infertility in men and would do everything they can to avoid vaccination.

We face a vague and complex case. Thinking carefully about it is not a perfect solution and prevention is far better than treatment. However, what if prevention fails? I say people who seek perfect solutions are far from perfect thinking. WE need working solutions right now and not perfect ones. Human behavior with its unpredictability is splitting the acceptance of vaccines even though the risks of not receiving them are higher than receiving them.

The second example is the Phillips curve– this curve served as a model to associate unemployment with inflation. The higher the unemployment is the lower the inflation is. This is because wages are the main fuel for inflation.

Again, here we notice that over short periods of time the curve is more reliable than prolonged times because of its complexity. Humans’ expectations are complex and the behaviors resulting from these expectations are hard to mode. Stagnation with higher unemployment and higher inflation is an established reality in many economies.

We should be careful to anchoring what we believe to be perfect and fixed solutions derived from models that link to the highly variable and inconsistent human behavior.

The third example is the Pareto rule– one way of expressing this rule is saying that 20% of employees do 80% of the work. This is a guiding rule and applies for short times, but not for long times because it ignores the complex and variable human behavior. For example, 20% of employees who do 80% of the work may complain that they do most of the work and feel stressed while others are on the salary scale even though they hardly do any work. They may disengage and start to care less and their productivity decreases. Alternatively, they may simply quit.

Perfection Is a Mirage

For managers, parents, writers, singers, or whoever who tend to reach perfection they are just chasing a dream that shall not realize. Nature does not seek perfection and it seeks working solutions. If they do, they are expecting their model to be perfect and this is a hugely wrong assumption. There is no perfect model. It is good enough under certain circumstances but shall fail outside their domain.

I smile when I read testimonials about the perfect worker or ideal worker who is a model for others to follow. The model implies the assumption the worker is perfect and no human is perfect.

The last example is this post– should I publish this post only after I feel is perfect and so that I keep on editing. Well, we know readability that ranges between 60-80 is good enough, but not perfect. This post has a score of 61.  I could try forever without success. In fact, after few times I may bore myself editing it and make it less efficient. Many writers keep editing. Sooner than later, they feel tired, bored, and only to make the post worse. Publish when it is good enough and learn from the feedback you get so that the next one may read better.

Stop the mistake of seeking perfection rather than working solutions.


Ali Anani
Ali Anani
My name is Ali Anani. I hold a Ph.D. from the University of East Anglia (UK, 1972) Since the early nineties I switched my interests to publish posts and presentations and e-books on different social media platforms.

DO YOU HAVE THE "WRITE" STUFF? If you’re ready to share your wisdom of experience, we’re ready to share it with our massive global audience – by giving you the opportunity to become a published Contributor on our award-winning Site with (your own byline). And who knows? – it may be your first step in discovering your “hidden Hemmingway”. LEARN MORE HERE


  1. As always inspiring food for thought, Ali.

    I am really curious about your comment about your post measuring 61. What does that even mean? Do you have a readability meter? If so, does it account for subject, style, and sense of humor? Or are you joking that this is the worst work you would not be too ashamed to publish?

    • No, I am not joking. You may use this link to measure the readability of your text and get an overview of its quality.

      They use different readability indexes. If you scroll down the page you shall find the formula and explanations.
      Grammarly does a good job as well.

      In fact, WinWord has also this embedded if you go to the proofing tab and check the readability index.

  2. I have often written, also in BZC, on the search for perfection, even in an ironic tone (Perfection is complete, absolute, certain and unchangeable… It is therefore “boring”, always the same, saturated and saturating !!).
    Perfection is like a mirage … you can see it in the distance … but every time you get close … it disappears and only the disappointment remains.
    It is said that … the pursuit of perfection is one of the fastest paths to unhappiness.
    I believe that if we have such a strong desire to be perfect, it is because we are worried about what others think of us, we ask them for recognition, approval … if we are perfect surely who could possibly criticize us or find a flaw in our work? In fact, the confidence of a perfectionist is conditional on achieving goals.
    When we want to be perfect, efficient and always “up to par”, we carry very heavy emotional loads on our shoulders, and we drown in performance anxiety or fantasies that others are misjudging us.
    What we need to aim for is the best possible result. Be aware that you have given or done your best with the resources at our disposal, considering all the variables, impediments and obstacles that are beyond our control and will.
    Perfection (excessive) is an obstacle rather than something to be proud of.

    • This is a super comment (Not perfect), Aldo.

      You captures my interest while reading every line of it.

      Their are systemic errors that if we try to play with we make the system worse. Humans have these systemic errors and they shall be there for if we try to improve them we make them worse than before.

      A hugely important point in your comment is the stress we get from chasing the impossible dream of perfectionism. Not only stress that burn us out, but also the rising levels of disappointment that we encounter This is the fuel to keep us burning.

      Instead of enjoying the journey, we miss its wonderment because of our focus on the destination that keeps moving further. We should stop chasing to shoot at a flying bird.

  3. Summary of the post

    What is common between human behavior and the weather behavior or forecasts? My answer is both are predictable. Both systems are complex and so subject to the butterfly effect and unpredictability.
    Anchoring a model to human behavior is wrong. How could we deduce model that is hard to believe because it anchors to a complex and unpredictable human behavior?
    The post offers four examples to explain this observation.
    The first example- is the reaction of humans to the corona virus and its irrationality.
    The second example- is the Phillips Curve. For long times the curve predicted the relationship between unemployment and inflation. The curve failed later as the world got more complex. The reason the curve anchors itself to the irrational and unpredictable human behavior.
    The third example- The Pareto Rule-, which states that 30% of employees do 80% of the work. Great, but it forgot the highlight the behavior of the 20% employees who do 80% of the work
    The fourth example- is the writing of this post and the wrong behavior is trying to make it perfect and error-free.
    The post concludes that we must seek working solutions and not perfect solutions. There is no perfection with human endeavors and behaviors.