It’s an interminable cycle, one’s activity is the aftereffect of inspiration built motive from another person, here assuming the part of the impact of MOTIVE, and simultaneously progress of this individual can be rousing for one more onlooker to perform activity consequently making this activity impact of Motive – Cause – Action & Consequence?.
- A few things occur for a REASON.
- EVERYTHING occurs with/for a CAUSE.
- REASON suggests THINKING or PLANING, which again intends that there must be an individual who makes the justification for additional activity or response.
- CAUSE is indifferent, it’s simply the setting off factor for additional activity or response.
- A flood NEVER occurs for a REASON, since no one plays it, yet it happens as an outcome of a weighty downpour or a dam catastrophe, and as you most likely are aware well, those things are IMPERSONAL.
- There is not an obvious Explanation for snow to tumble down in winter, there is only an ATMOSPHERIC CAUSE for it.
- Then again, you bring up your kids for a REASON, you go to work for a REASON and you wed or remain single for a REASON.
I suppose you can figure out that.
Thus, from the part of the reason, mishaps do exist, though from the part of the reason they don’t.
At last, no, things don’t occur for an explanation, they are only results of an activity. We’re just sacks of particles on a turning rock, there is not a great explanation for us to exist by any stretch of the imagination, thusly there is not an obvious explanation that “things” occur in our lives.
Perhaps you landed terminated from your position or you’re going through a separation, and it very well may be consoling to realize that there is a justification for your misery, yet there isn’t. You can find significance in everything that occurs in your life and you can make an emotional justification for your reality, yet even this is erratic; carrying on with a significant life doesn’t make any difference and any explanation you might find for something to happen doesn’t impartially exist.
“Reason” is an altogether human idea — it doesn’t exist in nature. Occasions are the consequences of point of reference causes, in view of all that we have noticed, yet the possibility of a “reason” has no spot other than in the human requirement for a clarification, which Nature feels no commitment to give.
Assuming current science has shown us anything, it’s that assuming we have the right conditions, we can anticipate and control actual peculiarities without the requirement for one or the other inspiration or clarification. We can’t at any point realize the reason why something occurs, yet science can let us know how it works out –I wonder???