by Carol Anderson, Featured Contributor

IN 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds after launch because of a failed O Ring that employees of NASA had earlier highlighted as a risk. Investigation into the tragedy revealed that NASA’s employees tried to sound the alarm before launch. For various reasons, they were not heard and seven people lost their lives.

The story of Challenger has been studied and dissected by every business school class, as an example of how the culture of silence is an overwhelming threat to an organization.

please-listen_smallToday’s complex healthcare industry uses the story of Challenger to raise awareness of the importance of psychological safety, allowing healthcare workers to challenge each other in the name of patient safety and quality.

Now we learn that former employees of Home Depot’s technology team warned leadership about the vulnerability of their data. They pointed to outdated security protocols and a laissez faire attitude toward the growing security threats made public by the Target invasion.

After the Target theft, The Home Depot engaged cyber security specialists to protect their systems, but the thieves were already there, resulting in the largest data breach in retail history.

From the NY Times article,

Several former Home Depot employees said they were not surprised the company had been hacked. They said that over the years, when they sought new software and training, managers came back with the same response: ‘We sell hammers.

Yowsers!

Corporate Social Responsibility

We are not talking about the local hardware store down the street, where we know the owners, and stop by to chat for a while.

This is a mega-publicly traded-company that has no right to “only sell hammers.” If they don’t realize that their information technology security is also a product that they sell to their customers, they’re sadly mistaken. Well, I suppose it is us that is sadly vulnerable.

Just as the old “mom-and-pop” hardware stores accepted a social responsibility within their community, these mega-stores have the same responsibility, just on a scale that is almost unimaginable.

Why in heck do you even have a Technology team if you think they are not part of your product offering, if their role is just to stay in the background and keep the systems running?

It’s the people, stupid

Large organizations today are as complex, if not more, than the government. Leadership of these large organizations is an awesome responsibility. Yet we still haven’t gotten the message that the key is in understanding the people, their behavior, the culture, and how people interact with each other.

No matter how good financial, technology and operational systems are, it’s the people that make them work. Or not.

We continue to minimize the people aspect of organizations, in business schools, and in practice. We spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on programs that will engage and motivate people, but we ignore the very reason people become unmotivated and unengaged….because they don’t have a voice with leadership.

Every single employee in every single organization has something of value to say. They may not be articulate in expressing their thoughts, or they may be timid in using their voice.  It is the responsibility of leadership to help them find their voice.

Back to Leadership

And so it all comes back around to leadership. Employees are most likely to open up to those leaders that they are closest to. Those leaders need to be able to establish trust and psychological safety. But the leaders above them need the same qualities. Regardless of the leader bringing issues or concerns to the table, if that leader is deemed to have a role in the organization, then must have a voice.

I continue to shake my head with all of the money spent on engagement and incentive programs, when the answer is in leadership.

Leaders who know how to build trust and commitment in their teams, and executives above them who create the platform for effective organizational communication, are the only real answer for today’s mega-companies. Without trust and commitment at every level, the organization is vulnerable. And today’s organizations cannot afford that vulnerability. It is their social responsibility to protect the customer.

Editor’s Note: This Article was originally published on atheintersection and is featured here with permission.



In the midst of a world where so many are disengaged, cynical and apathetic, isn’t it time for some fresh air? Isn't it time to join together in building a refreshing, new community founded upon “real” relationships, “real” thought leadership, and “authentic” engagement? NO Clutter. NO Spam. NO NO Fees. NO Promotions. NO Kidding. SIMPLY Pure Engagement Unplugged. ☕️ CLICK TO GRAB YOUR SEAT IN OUR NEW ENGAGE CAFÉ ☕️

avatar
3000
  Subscribe  
Notify of
lava kumar kota

Listening — key to success — Well emphasised and lucidly explained.

Ken Vincent
Ken Vincent

Fortunately most failures to listen to employees are not life threatening issues like the “O” ring was. If they were, the world population would be significantly smaller.

There are many reasons that employees are not listened to and their suggestions followed….of course most of those reasons are not good ones. “We can’t afford it right now, we don’t have time to focus on that, it isn’t important, etc., etc.

Perhaps the most common reason is that of pride and fear. If I didn’t think of it then it can’t be important, and I’ll look bad if I take some employee’s idea are never stated as reasons of course.

Ignore a few employees a few times and the upward communication stops.

Jack Bucalo

Carol,
Though the Challenger and Home Depot illustrations are obvious failures, I think it is also true that there are a lot of employee suggestions and comments that are not worthwhile from a business perspective.

Having said that, it is still critically important that management set up the necessary mechanisms to acquire and LISTEN to employee input AND have that input evaluated by an appropriate level of management for a quick reply. In doing so, management needs to accept the fact that there will be many more “false alarms” than there will be worthwhile comments.

Jack