Followership: Good Leaders are Created by Great Followers

Leadership and followership are two sides of the same coin, but we are used to seeing and studying only one.

Followership is not considered in managerial and organizational thinking. The cultural models in which we grew up clearly value the figure of the leader as much as they dismiss that of the follower.

Everyone considers themselves a leader or at least aspires to become one. In fact, with all the emphasis we place on developing leaders, we often forget the importance of followership and that effective leaders need effective followers to be successful.

Let me be clear, leadership matters a lot, but often in looking for the best leader figure we tend to lose sight of the people these leaders will lead (i.e. followership). And like leadership, followership also needs to be developed and taught.

After all, without collaborators or followers, the leader is just a man with big ambitions.

Among other things, in this “liquid” society no one is just a leader or just a follower, but one is both at the same time, and it happens to move from one position to another several times.

Followers are essential in the functioning of an organization. They are not passive followers, adepts without judgment. They are the collaborators, the employees of a company, endowed with a sense of responsibility and the ability to work as a team towards a goal. The success or failure of a project largely depends on them.

In different life situations, the same person is the leader and in others, he is the follower. And it also happens that a follower shows excellent skills to take on the function of a team leader. It is therefore advisable to be ready to play both roles.

Usually, the ability to be a good employee is considered only as the other side of being a great leader but they are two different things. Contrary to what the collective imagination thinks, followership does not coincide with mere execution but is expressed with a full, voluntary, and explicit organizational citizenship.

The leader himself creates value thanks to an adequate followership, and difficulty may surface without it.

We certainly do not deny that, if on the one hand, it is true that followers condition the success of a project, it is equally true that the leader influences the quality of the followers present in the team.

Leaders lacking confidence in themselves and in their own abilities will tend to create teams of conformist collaborators, i.e. who do not seek discussion and sharing of ideas, but will lead to the formation of teams basically made up of resigned followers.

An authoritative leader, on the other hand, needs to have effective followers alongside him, courageous people capable of thinking independently, questioning what they do not share, and providing valid alternatives on which to build continuous improvement.

A crucial aspect underlying the leader-follower relationship is reciprocity understood as complementarity: in reality, leadership and followership are conceivable only if they are related. Relationship within which the follower, grounding his knowledge and skills, is able to enrich and inspire the leader.

As followers we expect our leaders to provide motivation, direction, and influence. As leaders we expect our followers to get the job done and deliver results. It is a mutually beneficial relationship and it is impossible to have one without the other. So, the essence of followership does not lie in what followers do in general but in what they do in relation to the relationship they have with their leaders.

Specifically, it should be interesting to investigate how the followers take responsibility towards the leader, how they relate to the top positions, and how they deal with problems in relation to the existing leadership style in the company.

Ultimately, a very good follower, far from being a passive person, although in a non-equal relationship with the leader, shares with the same the common goal pursued by the company and operates, through a continuous proposition of ideas, independent evaluations, and constructive criticism, to ensure business success.

The leader creates good followership in the measure in which it has the possibility of choosing its employees associated with the ability to pull out the best from them. If the leader must be well versed in technical-relational skills, aimed at the management and development of his collaborators, the follower must also work on specific skills to increase his own relevance in the cooperation phase.

Some scholars who also dealt with the followers tried to define the collaborator that all leaders would like to have. Endowed with independent critical thinking, this kind of follower, without letting himself be conditioned by the role or hierarchical level, shows uniform behavior with everyone, evaluates the risks well, and manages to deal assertively with the conflicts that may arise.

He is able to manage the changes that the organization needs, share its goals, and knows how to express his opinions to anyone empathetically. He is aware of his role and acts on his own initiative, willingly placing his abilities at the service of the group.

This is the figure to aspire to in order to be considered an effective follower: people capable of thinking independently, who are actively committed to the success of a project in which they firmly believe.

What are its particular characteristics?

Enthusiasm, versatility, reliability, credibility, independent and critical thinking, courage to challenge the leader, commitment to achieve high performance, initiative, assumption of responsibility, professionalism in one’s work, willingness to act actively for the company mission, effective communication, and interpersonal skills.

I rather believe that there isn’t an ideal profile but many profiles, if not all, are usable for changing business needs, identifiable in relation to the specific business situation and organizational identity. Awareness of the systemic relationship that is triggered between the environment and the type of follower, of how to intervene appropriately, and what results you want to achieve.

Have you been a follower, a leader, or both?