by Carol Anderson, Featured Contributor
I WAS AN OVERWEIGHT, shy, only-child who moved every other year. I attended 11 schools from K through 12; tough to build friendships. In college, I made a very deliberate decision to change who I was, I lost weight, found a sorority with like-minded sisters, and learned social skills I’d not learned before. I then was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in the U. S. Marine Corps, and left that sad child behind. I don’t get intimidated often, but when I do, it is usually the “mean girls” from high school that flip my trigger.
What do I mean by “mean girls?” Well, hopefully the Rachel McAdams stereotype has grown up to be less overt, and more caring. Honestly, if she didn’t I think she will struggle in today’s workforce.
But there is still a behavior of women that triggers in me an instant urge to run away, and it happens when a group women behave as if they are a clique. When an outsider enters the perimeter, they let the outsider in, but their body language speaks volumes.
Typically these women have worked together enough to know each other pretty well, and be very comfortable that they think alike. When the outsider speaks, the members of the clique all look at each other to see if what the outsider said was acceptable. There is usually silence until someone speaks up and explains, for the group, why they do what they do and why change isn’t in the cards.
And they move on while the outsider decides whether to continue with their thought, or be quiet.
They don’t even realize that they have just shut down diversity, and from diversity comes innovation and contemporary thinking.
It seems to me to be a passive-aggressive behavior – it is passive resistance to anyone outside the clique even though they openly claim to embrace new members.
I don’t see this too often, thankfully. I did walk into a hornet’s nest of “Cliques-R-Us” in my last organization, and will forever recognize the signs of wandering eye contact. When the outsider talks, the insiders all look at each other, creating an immediate discomfort for the outsider that she said something wrong. I hope that was an unusual, over-the-top situation, and I am very grateful to not be there anymore. Until that experience, I believed that the “mean girl” syndrome stayed in high school.
But every so often, I will wander into a group of women and feel immediately like an outsider. Why?
They spend a lot of time talking about their shared past. They jabber together until someone else speaks up, and then there is silence. They are not open to ideas that are different. Even if it is a professional group, the personal, shared stories and jokes are exchanged so easily that creates an intimacy that says, “You are new and different; we are comfortable with who we are.”
I have quite a bit more confidence today than I did when in high school, and so I will typically provoke new ideas and throw out concepts, but after so many attempts, I just stop and move on.
My question is this: how much do we miss when we don’t encourage outsiders to be part of the team and the process?
Editor’s Note: This Article originally appeared on attheintersectionblog and is featured here with permission.
